Thomas Golden – 1763 Plat 200 acres Bush River, South Carolina

Thomas Golden is the first Golden known to own property in the Ninety Six District of South Carolina (1762, 63/67).

Newberry’s Council approved Thomas Golden’s request for 200 acres in 1762.

The Honorable Egerton Leigh, Esq., Surveyor General of the the province requested on November 2, 1763 that a plat for 200 acres be laid out for Thomas Golden in Berkeley Count on the north side of the Saluda River, on a branch of Bush Creek, called the Matthews Branch. The land on all sides of this parcel are vacant and the parcel itself was vacant prior to being surveyed. The survey was certified on January 31st 1763 by Isaac Perry, D.S. and also bears a date of Aug 1767.

1763 Jan 31 - Thomas Golding - 200 acres

1763 is an important year as this is when this territory was opened up for settlement. The French and Indian War (1756-1763) had just ended. To punish the Cherokees for siding with the French, the Cherokee boundaries were pushed to the western side of the Appalachian mount peaks.

1767 —  Although this former Indian territory was opened up for settlement by treaty in 1763, and land was actually surveyed and allocated to named settlers (such as Thomas Golden), settlement was not allowed until 1767, after a 1766 agreement between North Carolina, South Carolina and the Cherokee as to where the new boundary line would be.

COMMENT: I can find no family claiming descent from this Thomas Golden. There is a Thomas Golden/Golding that lives in the area through 1840; no family history exists for him in

1763 Jan 31 – Thomas Golden, Plat for 200 acres on Matthews Branch of Bush River. SC Archives;  see Series: S213184 Volume: 0010 Page: 00053 Item: 02. Mentioned within the document: Egerton Leigh, Isacc Perry, Berkeley County, Bush Creek, Matthews Creek and Saluda River.

There is no period map of this era known to me. I have followed the Bush River all the way to its source, well north of Newberry, and can find no branch called ‘Matthews’.

Due to major changes in waterflow from late 1960s/early 1970s dams for hydroelectricity, many of the smaller creeks of the 1700s have disappeared. What appears to be deep wide water today could once be easily forded and was a ‘creek’ in the most basic sense.

Thomas Golden 1763